Industry 'should pay for water clean-up'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.INDUSTRY and motorists should pay more towards the 'enormous' cost of cleaning up Britain's water, the National Consumer Council said yesterday, writes David Nicholson-Lord.
Over 10 years from 1994 the cost could add pounds 160, on top of inflation, to householders' water and sewerage bills.
The council says it is unfair for householders to pay for pollution that they have not caused. Instead, a tax should be levied on pesticide makers and motorists should pay for road drainage through the car licence duty.
In submissions to the Department of the Environment and the Office of Water Services, the regulatory body, it also opposes water metering, which it says carries serious health consequences, and urges the Government to consider outlawing disconnections.
The scope for individuals to reduce water consumption is limited and relies on more efficient appliances, it adds. Metering trials produced 'serious hardship'.
The council points to leaking mains - up to 38 per cent is lost through leaks in some companies - and says it is 'concerned in case a disproportionate share of the burden for water conservation is placed on individual citizens'.
It criticises the 'monopolistic' status of the water companies, the wide variation in charges and the above-inflation profits and dividends since privatisation.
The council backs 'the polluter must pay' argument, endorsed by the Government, which could mean a tax on pesticides, both to cut down on their use and to help pay for the clean-up of rivers.
Water bills have risen by nearly 5 per cent a year above inflation since 1989 and disconnections are at record levels.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments