How would PR have changed the face of Parliament?: The Supplementary Vote System
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.How it works: Supplementary Vote is a simpler version of Alternative Vote: voters mark only their first and second preference. If a candidate gets over 50 per cent of the first preference he or she is immediately elected. Otherwise, all but the two top candidates are eliminated and their second preferences are allocated.
Second preferences of the eliminated candidates do not count.
It is in essence the French system, except that you vote twice on the same day, instead of a week apart.
For: The simplest system. Constituencies remain the same, and each constituency has only one MP. The traditional 'X' is retained as a voting method. Campbell-Savours says it is preferable to AV, because 'You're voting for who you love, not who you can put up with'.
It is 'an engine for tactical voting', and the limited choice prevents fragmentation of the opposition vote.
Against: 'It is only five per cent of the way down the road to proportionality.' says Professor Philip Norton of Hull University. Others ask: Is it worth convulsing the system for so little real change?
Dale Campbell-Savours' figures (in table, below) are worked out on 1992 general election figures on the assumptions that, (a) That the Liberal Democrat secondary vote is split 50-50 between Tory and Labour; (b) 90 per cent of the Conservative and Labour secondary vote goes to the Liberal Democrat candidate.
However, the LSE figures for Alternative Vote show that only about 50 per cent of the secondary Labour or Conservative vote goes to the Liberal Democrat - giving the Liberal Democrats a minimum of 30 seats.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------- How it would have changed the Commons ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Con Lab Lib Dem SNP/PC Green MPs 304 (46.7%) 271 (41.5%) 46-49 (7.1-7.5%) n/a n/a -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments