Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How a hamster myth was born: Alex Renton hears the Freddie Starr legend of the 1980s debunked at a Cambridge debate

Alex Renton
Thursday 11 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A GREAT MYTH is dead. Freddie Starr did not eat the hamster. Max Clifford, public relations man to the stars, told the Cambridge Union last night that Mr Starr's grumpy girlfriend had merely tried to 'create that situation'.

Whether she actually tried to stuff the animal into Mr Starr's mouth or not, he did not reveal, but he did decide to exploit the situation for Mr Starr's benefit: successfully - it made the front page of the Sun. 'After the story his tour was sold out and we added another 30 dates.'

This week Mr Clifford has been exploiting the situation of Bryce Taylor, the gym owner who has made the Princess of Wales's workout famous. Peculiarly, he was speaking against a motion which called for the press's 'freedom to be irresponsible' to be upheld.

Since he makes his living out of an irresponsible press, he appeared, as several speakers said, to be attempting to do himself out of a job. But he was not calling for new legislation - he called for 'the press to pay. To pay for people like myself to be appointed to act for individuals who are suddenly thrust into the spotlight.'

Also speaking, somewhat out of character, for the motion was Alan Clark, Thatch erite minister turned salacious diarist. He told Cambridge that, lacking any effective opposition, there was in effect a ' one-party state' in Britain. Only the media could oppose it.

Subjective definitions of what constituted invasions of privacy would in reality mean 'anything that actually intrudes on our comfort, anything that will make it more difficult for them to get away with things'. He promised 'grand conspiracies and full- scale cover-ups'. This, of course, is a former minister at the centre of the arms to Iraq conspiracy.

Michael Mates, opposing the motion, went all out for the sympathy vote. 'I've had a rough time with the press: unlike Alan Clark - who might be said to have had a fairly rough time - I wasn't paid for it. The fact is I lost my job.' However, he did not call for statutory controls on the media - none of the celebrity speakers did.

Mr Clifford and Mr Mates had the best of it, in spite of squabbling unpleasantly over whether or not they had had lunch together in the summer to discuss Mr Major's problems with the magazine Scallywag. But they defeated the motion by a handsome 273 votes to 190.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in