Hospital X-ray dosage levels tightened
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PATIENTS in some hospitals are receiving doses of X-rays that are 20 to 30 times higher than those needed to obtain the diagnostic information, according to government radiation safety experts.
The National Radiological Protection Board hopes that the radiation doses received by patients from medical diagnostic X-rays will fall by half over the next few years, as a result of stricter procedures which it proposed yesterday.
Medical X-rays form 90 per cent of the dose which most people receive from 'artificial' sources of radiation, according to the board's secretary, Geoffrey Webb. A modest reduction in the doses from diagnostic X-rays could make a major difference to the public's radiation exposure.
He added: 'If the average dose in a department is high, there's probably something wrong with the department's procedures as a whole. They may be using older equipment or procedures, but something is causing them to use higher doses to get the same diagnostic information as the best hospitals.'
The new rules are part of sweeping recommendations on reducing radiation exposure which the board is putting forward following an international review, in 1990, which determined that radiation was about three times more hazardous than had been thought. But Britain will be introducing restrictions on the nuclear industry and on other users of radiation - such as industrial radiographers - that are tighter than the international norm if the Government follows the board's advice, as it is expected to do.
In addition, by making its position public now, Britain may be able to influence a European Community directive on radiation safety standards due in 1995.
The board is recommending that the legal dose limit for registered radiation workers should be reduced to 20 mSv a year from the existing 50 mSv a year. Doses to the public should come down from 5 mSv to 1 mSv, it says. The international recommendation is laxer: a worker could be exposed up to 50 mSv in any one year, provided the average over five years did not exceed 100 mSv (ie an average of 20 mSv a year over five years).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments