Home-owning family living in poverty trap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SUE THOMPSON and Ray Smith, her partner for 20 years, are a classic example of the new poor, low earners living in the mortgage trap, writes Rosie Waterhouse.
The only way they have staved off repossession is by cutting down on food and other essentials and running up debts that reached pounds 3,000 last year.
The couple and their three children, Leon, 16, Rebecca, 15, and Lesley, 12, cannot afford to pay for the funeral of Mr Smith's mother, who died this week.
Their three bedroom cottage near Corton, four miles outside Lowestoft, Suffolk, is heated in one room only by an open fire fuelled with wood collected by Mr Smith and the children from the nearby forest at weekends.
The family have one joint of meat a week and fill up on bread and home grown fruit and vegetables. All Ms Thompson could afford to buy the children for Christmas were stocking fillers. She is still paying off debts to catalogues for presents from three years ago.
Their formerly comfortable life in a cottage, worth about pounds 60,000, which was bought with a pounds 20,000 mortgage in 1984, ended two years later when the coachbuilding company that Mr Smith had worked for for 25 years closed.
He has had menial, low paid jobs ever since. As a father of three taking home pounds 130 a week from his job, and with Family Credit and child benefit, he would be pounds 40 a week better off unemployed. He would get about pounds 20 less in Income Support, child benefit and family premium, but the state would also pay his mortgage interest payment of pounds 60 a week. But 'he couldn't bear to be thought a parasite', Ms Thompson said.
If he was in rented accommodation he would also be better off because, even if he was working, he could claim Housing Benefit of almost pounds 57 a week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments