Home Office was told of Nilsen broadcast
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A SENIOR civil servant in the Home Office, and the governor of Albany prison were informed in advance by letter that Central Television intended to film for broadcast the interview between a clinical psychologist and the convicted serial killer Dennis Nilsen, writes Terry Kirby.
It is understood that notification was made after Central had begun filming research for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) on offender profiling, the subject of Murder in Mind.
In the High Court this morning, Central will contest the Home Office's application for the seven- minute Nilsen interview to be banned on the grounds that it is an infringement of copyright and against its standing policy of prohibiting published interviews with very serious offenders.
The hour-long film, including the Nilsen interview, may be shown to the court. A temporary injunction is in force banning screening of the interview.
The Home Office said its understanding was that the film was being made for police use only. However, it has been established that two cameras filmed the interview - one used by Central and a video camera used by the police.
Sources involved in the making of the film have suggested that the Home Office's position may result from a lack of communication between the department which sanctioned the interview and the prison department.
Whichever side loses today, an appeal is likely. Central can screen the film without the Nilsen interview or delay it until the legal process is complete.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments