Home Office seeks to ban Nilsen interview
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE HOME OFFICE was last night attempting to ban a television documentary which carries the first film interview with the mass murderer Dennis Nilsen, who is serving life in prison for 15 killings, writes Terry Kirby.
Government lawyers have served a writ on Central Television to prevent it broadcasting the interview in the documentary, Murder in Mind, scheduled to be screened on 26 January. The case is due to be heard in the High Court tommorow.
The circumstances under which the interview was obtained remained unclear last night. It is said to be a videotaped interview with a clinical psychologist at Albany maximum security prison on the Isle of Wight. It was not known whether it was shot by Central or whether it originated from a third party during the making of the film.
Home Office sources indicated that Central was offered facilities to help make a series of documentaries about offender profiling, a technique used in Britain and the United States to trap serial killers.
A spokeswomen said: 'The reason legal action is being taking is because we do not allow interviews with convicted prisoners. This is done to protect the families of the victims and prevent the return of any pain or suffering for them. People convicted of serious crimes are supposed to be locked away out of the public gaze.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments