Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former British Army commander says having women in the army 'will cost lives on the battlefield'

'No one pretends allowing women onto the front line enhances the army’s capabilities,' says Tim Collins

Harriet Agerholm
Sunday 10 July 2016 17:42 EDT
Comments
In wars, such as those fought in Iraq, women have not been allowed on the frontline
In wars, such as those fought in Iraq, women have not been allowed on the frontline (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lifting the ban on women in combat roles will "drag our infantry to far below the required standard" and put people at greater risk of dying, according to a former SAS commander.

"The infantry is no place for a woman, and to permit them to serve in close combat roles is a pure politically correct extravagance," Colonel Tim Collins has said, following David Cameron's announcement on Friday that women will be allowed to perform combat roles in the army.

He added: "No one pretends that allowing women onto the front line enhances the army’s capabilities."

Citing a report by the US Marine Corps from 2015, he added that having women in the armed forces would be more likely "cost lives on the battlefield".

But Hannah Bryce, from the Royal Institute of International Affairs, has said having women in the roles would make the army “more operationally effective", as well as more reflective of society.

"Wars are not just fought by men, and do not just affect men,” she told the BBC, “the battleground has already moved from the remote frontlines of 20th Century warfare to a more urban environment and as a result is influenced by all society and not just military personnel.

Female Kurdish army fight Isis

"The armed forces need women in all military roles if they are to understand and influence events on the battlefield and beyond.

She continued: "This is not just about fairness, but about winning."

Women are currently able to fill 80 per cent of jobs in the armed forces and make up more than 10 per cent of the work force.

One test involved in joining the infantry is completing an eight-mile march in less than two hours, while carrying 25kg. The army's reseach suggests less than 5 per cent of 7,000 female recruits would currently pass the physical tests.

Writing in the Telegraph, Colonel Collins' comments come after the findings of the Chilcot inquiry, which condemned both the government and the British Army for their failures in Iraq.

The former soldier said: "The physical bar for joining [close combat] units may need to be raised, never lowered."

He added: "We cannot tolerate... any attempt to play politics or mount social experiments with the armed forces."

However Mr Cameron said the change "will ensure the armed forces can make the most of all their talent."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in