Pensioner couple suing UK government over losing their winter fuel payment scared to turn on cooker
Peter and Florence Fanning said that pensioners are now being ‘punished’ by the government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Scottish couple who are suing the Labour government over the decision to axe winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners have said they are now fearful of turning their cooker on.
Peter and Florence Fanning, from Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire, have launched a legal bid against the UK and Scottish governments through the Govan Law Centre.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ announcement the benefit would be means tested from this winter onwards due to a £22bn financial “black hole” left by the Conservatives has proved controversial, with around 11 million pensioners set to lose out.
Speaking on Good Morning Britain, Mr Fanning said that having a workplace pension, which means he is not eligible for the payment, meant he was being “punished” by the government.
“When I was working, I was encouraged to join a pension fund to save for my old age, retirement, so that I would have a quality of life. It now seems that the government’s punishing me for having that pension and taking things off,” he said.
“During the winter, Florence and myself would make soup maybe twice up to three times a week and the grandkids would come and visit us. We’re actually frightened to put the cooker on just now.”
When asked by host Ed Balls what the couple would say to Ms Reeves, the 73-year-old replied: “I think there’s got to be a backtrack and totally think out the whole thing.
“Pensioners are people who plan ahead. I don’t know any pensioner that doesn’t plan ahead. You plan ahead for people’s birthdays, for Christmas, for your winter fuel, for all those things. That’s what pensioners do because they know they’re on a limited fund.
“That choice has been taken away from those pensioners because everyone was expected. Yeah, I’ve got £300.
“I don’t need to worry about my winter bill and all of a sudden that £300 has disappeared out of everybody’s now, that to say that some people are deserving and other people are not without actually carrying out an assessment. To me, it’s ludicrous. It’s also an injustice, and that’s why I’m fighting it.”
Mr Fanning has suffered a heart attack in recent years and has asthma, while his wife suffers from diabetes.
Their legal bid is being supported by former first minister Alex Salmond, who put them in touch with the centre, while the Alba party has been campagining for the winter fuel benefit to be reinstated.
The Govan Law Centre is seeking to expedite both the case and its application for legal aid for a decision to be made ahead of winter.
The judicial review, which has been raised at the Court of Session, now required a judge’s approval to move to a hearing on the merits.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments