Who wants high-cost Eurostar when a cheap flight is faster?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When François Mitterand and Margaret Thatcher ratified the Franco-British treaty on 29 July 1987, Europe was a different place. Anyone who wanted to fly between London and Paris was obliged to pay at least £100 return, or endure the seven-hour rail-sea connection for a minimum of half that fare.
The French president and British prime minister promised a brave new world of travel opportunities. The core of the railway, later to be known as Eurostar, was to be high-speed expresses linking London with Brussels and Paris. But the provinces would benefit too.
By the time the tunnel opened to commercial traffic on 14 November 1994, a Cypriot, an Irishman and an Italian were working independently on a form of transport that would scupper the politician's plans.
The joke was on Eurostar. Within a year, Stelios Haji-Ioannou and Michael O'Leary had introduced the first no-frills flights within Britain on easyJet and Ryanair respectively. Along with Franco Mancassola's Debonair, they rapidly expanded into Europe.
Suddenly, the price advantage that Eurostar sought, crumbled. A return flight on Ryanair from Glasgow to Paris on Monday will cost just £119. Even if Eurostar could match this, few travellers would be prepared to endure an eight-hour train ride when a 90-minute flight is available.
The terrible events of 11 September 2001, and the heightened security measures and travellers' fears that followed, presented Eurostar with a huge opportunity. Yet the company continues to operate as if it were an airline, with all the hassle of a half-hour check-in, immigration controls and security searches. Were it to abandon these impediments, and operate just like any other international train within Europe, the product would immediately be much more attractive.
But as Concorde showed, Anglo-French transport endeavours involve extravagant investments, ambitious promises and poor returns.
The same time saving could be made for a total of £0, by abandoning the minimum check-in time. With a more attractive product, Eurostar might actually start hitting its financial targets, to the relief of the taxpayers of France and Britain.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments