Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Two years on, Jarvis accepts liability for Potters Bar crash

Barrie Clement Transport Editor
Tuesday 27 April 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nearly two years after the Potters Bar rail disaster, the two companies at the heart of the crash finally admitted liability yesterday.

The head of Jarvis Rail, which maintained the points that broke apart when an express train sped across them, said "sorry" for the first time on behalf of the company.

Jarvis had continued to insist that sabotage was a probable cause of the derailment despite scepticism by Health and Safety Executive inspectors who pointed to management failures. The company has sent a letter to bereaved relatives and survivors apologising for the "hurt and anger" that its responses may have caused.

John Armitt, chief executive of the state-backed infrastructure firm Network Rail, said he wanted to restate an apology made immediately after the tragedy. Mr Armitt's company took over from Railtrack, which was ultimately responsible for maintenance at the time of the disaster in which seven people were killed and 76 injured. Louise Christian, leading solicitor for the bereaved and injured, alleged that the admission of guilt was a "cynical manoeuvre". She said that the Government was colluding with the companies to avoid the kind of full public inquiry which followed the Southall and Ladbroke Grove disasters.

Ms Christian said the police had ceased investigating the crash and she would be pressing ahead with an application for a judicial review of the refusal to hold an inquiry.

The novelist Nina Bawden, who lost her husband Austin Kark in the tragedy, expressed bitterness over the assertion by Jarvis that sabotage might have been to blame: "Why did Jarvis insist for so long that little green men were responsible for the crash?"

She said the admission of liability was welcome because the bereaved had been refused legal aid and were facing the prospect of funding litigation out of their own pockets.

But she said it reinforced the need for an immediate public inquiry. "People need to know precisely what is going wrong on the railways and why these two major companies, one of which is very close to the Government, refused to accept blame for so long."

Kevin Hyde, chief executive of Jarvis plc, said: "Everyone at Jarvis was deeply saddened by the tragic event at Potters Bar and its terrible impact on the lives of the victims, their families and friends. We are sorry that it happened. We are also sorry that, nearly two years after the accident and a great deal of expert examination, final conclusions have not yet been reached. Jarvis has co-operated fully and will continue to work with everyone involved to find the answers."

Formally accepting its share of liability, Network Rail pointed out that "a few months" after the accident, the industry announced that Railtrack would take the lead in settling claims as if liability had been accepted.

"This was to ensure that the issue of liability did not stand in the way of settling claims or cause unnecessary distress to those involved while the accident remained under investigation."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in