Tunisia inquest: Coroner's verdict labels local police response as 'at best shambolic, at worst cowardly'
Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith says police response could and should have been better
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.On the final day of six weeks of hearings into the deaths of 30 Britons at a seaside resort in Sousse, Tunisia, Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith condemned the reaction of Tunisian police when an Islamist gunman, Seifeddine Rezgui, began shooting at the Riu Imperial Marhaba Hotel: “Their response could and should have been effective.”
The inquests heard that police were slow to respond, with some officers fainting or running away.
The Coroner is delivering his conclusions at the end of the inquests into the deaths of 30 British tourists during the attack on 26 June 2015.
He told the bereaved families: “Throughout the proceedings, you have shown a quiet dignity for which your loved ones would have been extremely proud.”
Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith said: “Unarmed guards could not have done much against a terrorist with a Kalashnikov and grenades.
“Had the attack been seen on CCTV, it might have been identified sooner but not much sooner.
“The attack was so unexpected and sudden that I cannot say that if an emergency evacuation procedure had been carried out, it would have been effective.
“The one security measure that may have made a difference was having an armed guard. Having reviewed the gun law in Tunisia, it is clear that was not a realistic option.”
During the inquests, several families of the victims have said that their relatives would not have gone to Tunisia if they had been told of the Foreign Office warnings after the Bardo Museum attack in March 2015.
The Coroner said: “I recognise that some customers had seen and read the FCO advice, they may well have not travelled to Tunisia."