True stories from the Great Railway Disaster; No 34: so competition is a good thing?
A weekly chronicle of the absurdities caused by the Government's privatisation programme
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PASSENGERS at Denmark Hill in south London may be confused as to why, every half- hour, they have two trains to central London within three minutes of each other and then none for 27 minutes.
Graham Larkbey is secretary of a south London rail passengers' association. For years his group campaigned to have the peak-hours-only service along the Peckham Rye-Victoria corridor extended to run during the day and eventually, a few years ago, they succeeded.
The service is run by Network SouthCentral, one of the 25 train-operating companies being prepared for privatisation, but South Eastern, a rival company, spotted what it thought was a market gap and launched its own Victoria-Peckham Rye-Lewisham-Dartford service.
While Mr Larkbey was pleased to see such a service introduced, he was worried that it affected NSC's Victoria-London Bridge service, especially as South Eastern's does not serve as many intermediate stations. And, as Mr Larkbey put it, "Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill have a most ill-balanced service pattern, with two Victoria trains within minutes of each other followed by a long gap". South Eastern refused to retime its trains to provide a more regular service.
Unhappy about South Eastern's response, Mr Larkbey wrote to the Rail Regulator, John Swift, the man appointed to look after the interests of passengers. Mr Swift's reply said: "I have a duty, amongst other things, to exercise my functions in the manner I consider best fitted to protect the interests of rail users. However, I have no statutory power to require BR, or any of its train-operating companies, to maintain or provide particular services."
Given that one of Mr Swift's specific tasks is the regulation of competition, Mr Larkbey's response is: "Faced with this response, one can only ask, what is the rail regulator for?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments