Trident replacement 'not realistic'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Government review will provide "credible" alternatives to the like-for-like replacement of Trident, a Cabinet minister said yesterday.
Liberal Democrat Danny Alexander, who has led the review, dismissed Tory demands for a new continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent as "not financially realistic". The Government is spending around £1.4bn on early design work for Trident replacement submarines, but the final decision about whether to go ahead is not due until after the general election.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments