Treasury criticised for selling silver
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The leading body dedicated to rescuing works of art for the nation has attacked Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, for selling the Treasury's silver.
David Barrie, director of the Art Fund, formerly known as the National Art Collections Fund, said he was shocked at the surprise decision by the Treasury to auction a collection of 17th-century silver made for the use of the Privy Council.
The first public disclosure of the controversial sale was given last week with the publication by Bonhams of an auction catalogue. Listed were details of candlesticks, snuffers and meat skewers that are expected to fetch at least £100,000 later this month. Some are engraved with the royal arms of King William and Queen Mary and of Queen Anne.
Mr Barrie said the collection should have first been offered to a museum. His own private talks with museum curators suggested the pieces were more important than the Treasury claimed.
Mr Barrie said: "We're astonished that the Treasury should have decided to sell such extraordinarily historically important works of art without apparently consulting the relevant experts.
"One wonders whether it wouldn't have been more appropriate for the Treasury ... to donate them to the Victoria & Albert Museum where they would be properly looked after and seen by millions of people."
But a Treasury spokesman said it had consulted the experts who ran the Government's own art collection, the Department of Culture and English Heritage before the sale. "Although the pieces are clearly attractive and interesting they are not of any major historical significance in themselves," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments