Train drivers threaten rail chaos
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The threat of "utter chaos" on the railways because of action by drivers was averted today after talks helped to resolve a row over safety.
The threat of "utter chaos" on the railways because of action by drivers was averted today after talks helped to resolve a row over safety.
Aslef had warned that its members would refuse to drive trains from next Monday in areas covered by a contentious communications system.
The action would have involved up to 5,000 drivers, causing "utter chaos" to train services, including those between London and Glasgow, London and Manchester, and London and Crewe, the union warned.
But hours after the union sounded its warning, top level talks were held with managers from Network Rail and other rail industry officials.
Aslef called off the planned action and said it was satisfied with assurances given at the meeting.
Rail companies had withdrawn instructions to continue working normally if the communications system failed, said Aslef.
Acting general secretary Keith Norman said he regretted the concern the proposed action had caused, adding: "I am convinced that it was necessary to protect not only our members but all the travelling public."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments