Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tracey Emin paints ugly picture of Turner prize as flawed and unjust

John Walsh
Thursday 05 December 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

On the eve of the announcement of this year's winner of the Turner prize, the UK's most controversial art award, the artist Tracey Emin has launched a bitter attack on the judging process, claiming it was fatally flawed by compromise voting and favouritism.

The judging panel, which is chaired by the Tate director Sir Nicholas Serota, narrowly failed to select Emin to win the £20,000 prize in 1999 with her much-criticised exhibit My Bed. "The Turner prize is unfair," she said. "I used to believe that any of the artists considered for it genuinely had a fair chance of winning. I believed it was done by democratic vote, and that anyone could win. The artists who are nominated believe it, the public believes it, but it's not true.

"The four judges nominate four people who they want to win. Then one judge says, 'I'm not having Jake and Dinos Chapman – over my dead body'. The second one replies, 'In that case, you can't have So-and-so', and you end up with a watered-down list of artists; they're not the artists who the judges wanted.

"It's never the people who deserve to get nominated [who get through to the shortlist]. And compromise candidates never win. It doesn't matter how brilliant their show might be, or what they've done for British art, they're never going to get the prize because no one actually wanted them on the list; they were put there as a compromise candidate".

Emin went on: "I think that's what happened to me when I was shortlisted in 1999, because none of the judges for that year's prize had had any association with me.

"All the judges had worked one-to-one with each of the other artists. But I didn't know any of the judges".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in