Helmets should be compulsory for cyclists, says Tour de France champion Geraint Thomas
Government currently carrying out cycling safety review designed to reflect public concern over safety on roads
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tour de France champion Geraint Thomas has said cyclists should be forced to wear helmets.
The cycling professional, from Cardiff, Wales, said there was “no reason” not to wear a helmet when biking through the streets of London.
He told the Sunday Times Magazine: “I’ve never ridden a bike in London, apart from in a race.
“I’ve watched from a taxi and it does seem a bit crazy. I would certainly make helmets compulsory.
“I always wear a helmet, I’ve put on a helmet more times than I’ve buckled a seatbelt.
“Helmets have come on a lot – well ventilated, not too hot, you don’t look stupid – no reason not to.”
The government is currently carrying out a cycling safety review designed to reflect public concern over safety on the roads.
Cycling UK – the UK’s national cycling charity – is opposed to helmet laws and campaigns to promote their use because they are “almost certainly detrimental to public health”.
The charity said: “Evidence shows that the health benefits of cycling are so much greater than the relatively low risks involved, that even if these measures caused only a very small reduction in cycle use, this would still almost certainly mean far more lives being lost through physical inactivity than helmets could possibly save, however effective.”
The policing resources required to enforce a ban would be “grossly disproportionate to any possible benefits”, it added.
Press Association
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments