Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Top judges to rule on 'tag' game injury case

Wednesday 18 March 2009 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three senior judges are to decide whether boys playing tag in a school playground can be held responsible for the injuries caused to adults when they bump into them.

A school dinner lady, Michelle Orchard, 37, was seriously injured in January 2004 when a 13-year-old pupil collided with her while running away from a school friend during the chase game.

A county court judge ruled in May last year that a boy of 13 playing tag would not realise that his actions could give rise to the risk of injury. But yesterday Anthony Coleman, representing Ms Orchard, told three Court of Appeal judges that Sebastian, who started the game, and the 13-year-old chasing him at Corfe Hills School in Dorset, were "sufficiently old enough to be well aware of the need to conduct [themselves] so as to not cause injury to others not participating in the boisterous behaviour".

Benjamin Browne QC, representing the boy, said: "This appeal raises a stark and important question: does the law of tort [a legal wrong] have any part to play in the regulation of simple and time-honoured playground games between young children?"

Lord Justice Waller, Lord Justice Rimer and Lord Justice Aikens reserved their ruling.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in