Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tobacco salesman given 1,200 free cigarettes a month has inoperable lung cancer

‘Industry chiefs hid evidence that smoking was heavily addictive,’ lawyers claim

Jane Dalton
Thursday 25 April 2019 16:15 EDT
Comments
In 90 seconds: A history of smoking laws

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A former tobacco salesman who was given free cigarettes as a perk of the job and now has inoperable lung cancer is hoping to sue his ex-employer.

Lawyers say they are also looking at bringing other cases against British American Tobacco (BAT) on behalf of former employees.

Simon Neale, 57, was given 1,200 cigarettes a month to give away or use, becoming a regular and heavy smoker while he worked for Rothmans, which later merged with BAT.

He often had 30,000 cigarettes in a safe in his car boot during the four years he was an employee.

After being diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer late last year, he quit smoking.

“It’s staggering looking back on it, but I was told when I joined the company that I’d be getting 1,200 free cigarettes a month,” he said.

“Working at Rothmans, I went from being an occasional smoker, a social smoker, to being a heavy smoker because I had so many cigarettes given to me.

“Last autumn, I was diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer and it knocked me for six. The worst thing was telling the children. The lung cancer has all come about from me working for Rothmans.”

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (Ash), said tobacco executives knew of the dangers of smoking.


Simon Neale on the job as a cigarette salesman

 Simon Neale on the job as a cigarette salesman
 (PA)

At BAT’s annual general meeting on Thursday, the charity will call on the company to reveal full details of its policy of handing out free cigarettes.

Ms Arnott said: “Simon Neale is not the only one. Many thousands of employees were given free cigarettes, and free cigarettes were also doled out to the public.

“Big tobacco promoted its products while hiding from the public – and its own employees – its own evidence that smoking was heavily addictive.

“We’d encourage anyone now suffering serious smoking-related disease who took up smoking before the 1990s to come forward and tell us their story.

“Big tobacco must be called to account.”

Simon Cleverly, of BAT, said: “Historically, BAT employees had the option to receive a monthly allowance of cigarettes.

“At all times, these products complied with all applicable laws and regulations, including the relevant health warnings.

“In a small number of markets – six out of approximately 200 – this allowance continues as a result of collective bargaining agreements with local trade unions, and the products supplied comply with all applicable local regulations, including health warnings.”

Lawyer Richard Meeran, of Leigh Day, acting for Mr Neale, said: “We believe that giving employees huge quantities of highly addictive, powerfully cancer-causing cigarettes, free of charge, and placing them in a work environment in which they are encouraged to smoke, is a flagrant breach of an employer’s duty of care.”

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Additional reporting by PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in