Thousands of prisoners face HIV screening
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prisoners are to be tested for HIV as part of the biggest survey so far into the spread of the Aids virus within British jails. Scientists are finalising plans to begin screening thousands of volunteers in the next few weeks to help determine the risk ofinmates contracting HIV in prison.
The Prison Service said that at any one time within the constantly changing prison population of about 49,000 there are only about 35 known prisoners in England and Wales who are HIV positive. The national figure - including Scotland and Northern Ireland- is nearer 50.
The Prison Reform Trust, however, believes the true number could be ten times as great and is concerned that underestimates may make prison authorities complacent about the risks of HIV transmission. ``Shared needles by injecting drug users is probably the key element in the spread of infection in jails,'' it said.
A full survey of English and Welsh prisons is to begin ``shortly'' to discover the true prevalence of HIV, according to Ahilya Noone, who will carry out the research for the Government's Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre in London.
A pilot survey of prisoners was carried out in 1993. Just over half of a sample of 1,150 men eligible to take part actually did so. The results, published last week, showed that 0.3 per cent - two out of 584 - were HIV positive. But researchers were concerned that the large proportion of prisoners who refused to take part may have skewed the data.
Dr Noone said the results will be anonymous and not linked to any possible identifying details. Prisons in the London area will be first to take part in the survey. ``We plan to look at eight to 10 prisons in a year." Similar surveys of Scottish prisons have shown wide differences in the proportion of prisoners willing to take part in HIV surveillance programmes.
In 1993, only 43 per cent of 378 inmates in one prison agreed to be tested. A dozen prisoners - 7 per cent - proved to be positive. Last year, 92 per cent of the 1,073 inmates of Barlinnie Prison in Glasgow took part in a similar survey and only nine - about 1 per cent - were positive.
So far there are only two confirmed cases of prisoners becoming infected with HIV whilst in prison. Both occurred in a Scottish prison where needle sharing had taken place.
An Aids advisory committee has made a number of recommendations on how to limit the spread of HIV in prisons ``which are currently being considered'', according to the Prison Service.
Although educational videos and the issuing of protective clothing to prison staff have been introduced, the more controversial suggestions have not, the Prison Reform Trust said.
Proposals to issue syringe/needle exhanges and condoms have been made by a variety of agencies. They have not been accepted by the Prison Service, the Trust said.
``The argument against needle exchange is that it would condone illicit drug use, especially at a time when the Prison Service is planning a `war on drugs' in the prisons.''
The Prison Service, however, said there is evidence to suggest that many of those who have injected drugs before entering prison stop doing so once in prison.
``It is a question of balancing the risk of increasing injecting within a prison by providing needles against the risk faced by a small number of inmates who continue to inject.''
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments