Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The mystery of perfect parallel parking is solved (by a woman)

Charles Arthur
Friday 18 April 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Perfect parallel parking is easy – provided you use a formula from a female mathematician.

The fact that poor reversing causes £151m of damage every year, according to insurance estimates, was the spur for Rebecca Hoyle, a doctor of mathematics at the University of Surrey, to devise the formula.

It allows for the main variables – the width of the car, its turning circle, the optimal distance from the kerb, and the starting distance between the axles and the kerb. Then, to perform the perfect S-shaped parallel reverse park, the formula says drivers should:

  • choose space at least half as long again as car
  • start parallel to car ahead
  • turn wheel to left-lock while reversing
  • when car reaches 45 degrees to space, turn wheel to full right-lock
  • as car approaches kerb, straighten up.

If this sounds familiar, be grateful it wasn't Dr Hoyle's full version. "[The problem] can be expressed as a motion-control problem using shape change," she says.

"But in practice this formula should be supplemented with some pure common sense – such as using any available reflections in cars opposite to judge your position."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in