Tesco keeps chemistry set as a boys' toy despite protests
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tesco has defended its decision to label a children’s chemistry set a boys’ toy, despite criticism from gender equality campaigners.
Campaigners from Let Toys Be Toys, an online pressure group that is calling on retailers not to limit children’s development by promoting separate “boys’” and “girls’” toys, said that Tesco’s labelling of its “Action Science Chemistry Set” was sexist.
A Tesco spokesman responded on Twitter: “Toy signage is currently based on research and how our customers tell us they like to shop in our stores” adding that “further research” would be commissioned later in the year to ensure “an up-to-date reflection of customers’ thinking”.
Last week Boots agreed to remove in-store signs advertising different toys for boys and for girls following pressure on social media from the Let Toys Be Toys group. The shop admitted it had been “wrong” to categorise toys from the Science Museum as boys’ toys.
A Let Toys Be Toys spokesman challenged Tesco’s position on Twitter, writing: “Can you imagine if we took yr approach in schools: that science was just for boys & we shouldn’t bother teaching it to girls?”
The campaign group tweeted a picture comparing the chemistry set, which is advertised for boys aged 9 to 12, with a pink, Hotpoint Toy Cooker that is categorised as a girls’ toy.
It is common for retailers to advertise separate boys’ and girls’ toys but the practice has come under increasing amounts of criticism from those who say its limits children’s social development along gender lines.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments