Teachers could get protection against blasphemy claims under new laws
The report has been influenced by recent blasphemy cases, which has seen some teachers forced into hiding
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Teachers could be given protection from claims of blasphemy under proposals reportedly set out in a new government-commissioned report.
According to The Times, the report will urge the Department for Education (DfE) to issue schools with statutory guidance to protect teachers’ freedom of expression – including that schools should not automatically suspend teachers over blasphemy claims.
It would also prevent schools from publicly identifying teachers involved and, unlike sex education, schools would not be obliged to consult parents, faith or community groups on educational content that might insult religious groups.
It is thought the report has been influenced by recent blasphemy cases in the UK which have seen some teachers being forced into hiding.
The guidance comes after a YouGov survey of more than 1,000 teachers found 16 per cent admitted to having self-censored in order to avoid causing religious offence. The Policy Exchange think tank claimed this had created a “de facto blasphemy code in schools across the country”.
It made reference to the Batley Grammar School incident in March 2021, where a teacher was forced into hiding and received death threats after showing a class a picture of the prophet Muhammad, and said it had “clearly scared the teaching profession”.
The teacher remains in hiding with his partner and four young children and has said he felt “let down” by his school and police after his identity became known.
Some 55 per cent of teachers polled said they would never use an image of the Islamic prophet in class and a further nine per cent cited the Batley incident as the reason they would not do so.
Another incident thought to have informed the report was when parents attempted to stop LGBT+-inclusive education at a school in Birmingham in 2019 on religious grounds.
The report advised that anti-blasphemy activists should still be allowed to protest in a responsible way, but said teachers accused of blasphemy should not be named.
The report by the Government’s adviser on political violence and disruption, Lord Walney, is expected to be published next week with more than 40 recommendations for government and public bodies.
Officials in the Department for Education (DfE) are understood to be already drafting new guidance that could be issued to schools before the next academic year in September.
Lord Walney declined to comment on the report but a government spokesperson said: “Extremism of any kind has no place in our society and we will not tolerate tactics that set out to intimidate, threaten or cause disruption to the law-abiding majority.
“In recent months, we have also witnessed a small number of protesters display violent and hateful behaviour, and the police have our full support in tackling extremism and hate crime.
“We will consider the report’s final recommendations extremely carefully and will respond in due course.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments