Council in Kent calls planning application ‘whack’ in bizarre admin blunder
Council leader ‘extremely frustrated’ by the mistake
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An animal sanctuary in Kent has had its planning application rejected and called “whack” in a bizarre administrative mistake by the local council.
The error occurred in mid-August when officers from Mid Kent Planning Support, which runs the service for Swale Borough Council, ran a dummy trial to fix a software issue.
During this process, five decision notices were inadvertently sent to applicants, including Amey James, the founder of The Happy Pants Ranch animal sanctuary.
She was told that her plea to keep her charity at its site in Bobbing, near Sittingbourne, had been rejected. By way of explanation, the council’s official comments said “your proposal is whack” and “no mate, proper whack”.
Commenting on the incident, Ms James told The Independent: “I went through a range of emotions when I first saw the planning refusal; panic, upset, devastation.
“Of course I felt relieved to know it was an error, but I am disappointed that now the charity has to wait another three or four months before it gets the decision on whether or not the sanctuary can stay,” she said, adding that her proposal was supposed to be considered this month.
Other requests were met with similarly sarcastic responses, with a pub in Sittingbourne given the green light for partial demolition with the words “incy, wincy, spider”.
In a statement, council leader Roger Truelove apologised to the people who were affected, saying he was “extremely frustrated” by the event. An investigation into the incident has been launched.
To make matters worse, the council cannot easily cancel the bogus planning decisions.
“Although the notice of decision has been produced in this bizarre way, the decisions can only be overturned by our applying for a judicial review of these decisions. We have already initiated this process,” Mr Truelove explained.
It is understood that fixing the decision will cost thousands of pounds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments