Supreme Court to rule on abestos payouts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A legal battle to determine whether tens of thousands of asbestos-related cancer victims and their families will be compensated is to be heard by the Supreme Court tomorrow.
Four insurance companies are trying to restrict payments to workers dying from mesothelioma, by claiming that employers' liability is restricted to when the lethal tumours start to develop instead of when the victims were exposed to the deadly dust. Decades can pass before the cancer develops. If the insurers lose, the compensation bill could be in excess of £250m.
Asbestos exposure is the biggest killer in the British workforce, causing more than 4,000 deaths each year – more than road traffic accidents. Deaths in the UK are not expected to peak until 2016.
The outcome of the case will influence the creation of a Government "fund of last resort" for victims of asbestos exposure but who cannot trace their employers' insurers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments