State may be left with £26m rail freight bill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government took on an unnecessary risk when it agreed to hand over Britain's rail freight distribution to the private sector with £242m in sweeteners, a Commons committee said last night. The Public Accounts Committee said further payments might still have to be made. An agreement that British Rail would continue to pay Eurotunnel for the use of the Channel Tunnel for freight could cost £26m before it ran out in 2006.
The Government took on an unnecessary risk when it agreed to hand over Britain's rail freight distribution to the private sector with £242m in sweeteners, a Commons committee said last night. The Public Accounts Committee said further payments might still have to be made. An agreement that British Rail would continue to pay Eurotunnel for the use of the Channel Tunnel for freight could cost £26m before it ran out in 2006.
The committee said even though Railfreight Distribution made a loss of £64.5m in the year to March 1996 - the last full year before its sale in November 1997 - the Government could have done more to cut its losses. It should have taken action to encourage growth in rail freight before it sold the service, its report said.
When Railfreight Distribution was sold to English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Holdings (EW&S), the Government agreed to make net payments of £242m over eight years, at today's prices. It also agreed to underwrite the risk of lost business should EW&S decide to discontinue its freight services through the Channel Tunnel. The report suggested the sale had undermined competition in the rail freight industry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments