Sexting teenagers taking erotic selfies should not be branded sex offenders, campaigners say
If a teenager is found to have shared an indecent image they can be arrested, charged, and if found guilty, must register as sex offenders, police have warned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Teenagers who take erotic selfies and share them consensually with partners or friends are being unfairly branded as sex offenders, campaigners have said.
Myles Jackman, a lawyer who specialises in obscenity law, said the law is not clear enough for young people to be aware that, if they are over 16 and therefore over the age of consent, they cannot take “erotic selfies” and share them until they reach the age of representation, which is 18.
At present, anyone under the age of 18 who takes and distributes a naked picture of themselves can be found guilty of committing an offence under child sex laws.
Jackman, who is a legal adviser to anti-censorship campaign group Backlash, said the disparity between the age of consent and the age of representation, which is when a person can legally record or view a sexual act, told the Guardian,, “seems counter intuitive and dangerously against sex education”.
Police began to warn teenagers of the risks of sexting last year, stating the possibility that sending erotic images of themselves could result in their name being added to the sex offenders register.
At the time, Nottinghamshire police cited the example of a teenage girl under the age of 18 who sent a topless picture of herself to her boyfriend, and was then investigated for distributing and indecent image of a child. The girl’s boyfriend then received a caution for sending the message to his friends after the couple split up.
“If a person is aged over 10 years and distributes (shares - even to friends) an indecent image then they can be arrested, charged and dealt with for this offence. If they are found guilty they must then register as a sex offender,” Detective Inspector Martin Hillier said at the time.
But Backlash said that when authorities find these images, they “become subject to laws originally aimed at stopping child abuse, even though no abuse has taken place”.
A spokesperson for Backlash added: “These prosecutions cause immense mental distress, and disruption to education. A prosecution, regardless of sentencing outcome, severely harms the future life prospects of young people.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments