Selfridges accused of installing ‘inhumane’ anti-homeless spikes
Spikes appeared in front of a Manchester department store
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A petition against metal spikes placed in front of a flagship department store in Manchester city centre has attracted more than 3,000 signatures, in the latest backlash against so-called "hostile" urban architecture.
The the metal studs, which make it more difficult – if not impossible – for rough sleepers to bed down, are alongside a narrow ledge close to the staff entrance of Selfridges. The retailer rebuts claims it is an anti-homeless measure, saying the studs are designed to stop staff smoking in the area.
University lecturer Cathy Urquhart, 53, who started the petition, described the studs as “inhumane” and said she first noticed them on Friday as she commuted to work in Manchester from West Yorkshire.
Her petition follows a backlash in London last summer when a branch of Tesco in Regent Street installed the studs, leading to days of protests outside the store. The supermarket insisted they were designed to deter anti-social behaviour, not homeless people, but later removed them.
A block of luxury flats near London Bridge with similar spikes also had to remove them after a petition gained more than 100,000 signatures. London Mayor Boris Johnson called them “ugly, self-defeating and stupid.”
Other so-called hostile architecture includes uncomfortable sloping benches at bus stops and Mosquito devices, which emit an irritating high-pitched noise.
Ms Urquhart, from Hebden Bridge, said: “These spikes are an affront to humanity. They tell the homeless that they are not welcome, that they are a problem to be moved on.
“We should be looking after the homeless, not demonising and scapegoating them. Manchester is better than this.”
The Big Issue in the North, the magazine sold by homeless people, is equally unimpressed by the spikes and the general trend to displace homeless people from city centres.
Fay Selvan, its chief executive, said: “This news highlights the fact that there are still people rough sleeping, and as one of the richest countries in the world, it shouldn’t be the case that anyone has to sleep rough.” Jon Sparkes, chief executive of the homeless charity Crisis, also criticised the studs, saying homeless people “deserve better.”
“Behind these numbers are real people struggling with a lack of housing, cuts to benefits and cuts to homelessness services to help them rebuild their lives,” he told The Independent. “We will never tackle rough sleeping with aggressive measures like studs in the pavement.”
A spokesman for Selfridges said the ledge is very narrow and mostly used by staff having cigarette breaks. In a statement, the company said: “Selfridges installed the studs on 1 December last year as part of a number of measures to reduce litter and smoking outside the store’s team entrance, following customer complaints.”
Manchester Street Angels said they will set up their street kitchen by Selfridges on Saturday unless the spikes are removed. Other groups, including Help the Homeless said they would, too, be joining the protest.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments