‘They did their duty’: Met boss defends Sarah Everard vigil officers after backlash
Deputy commissioner says he ‘can’t apologise for officers’ and says they were enforcing coronavirus laws
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior leader of the Metropolitan Police has defended the officers who policed the vigil for Sarah Everard at Clapham Common, and said they did their “duty”.
The arrest of female attendees after Scotland Yard refused to facilitate a socially distanced event planned by Reclaim These Streets has sparked an independent investigation following a backlash from the public and MPs.
Sir Stephen House, deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, said the force would support the independent inquiry, but that he believed the officers present were “doing their duty as they saw it”.
“I can't apologise for my officers,” he told the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee on Wednesday.
“I am sorry of course that people are so upset at seeing officers enforcing legislation, but the officers were doing their duty as they saw it and I will not second guess that at this moment in time.”
A vigil originally organised for 6pm last Saturday by a group called Reclaim These Streets was cancelled after the Metropolitan Police refused to facilitate it and said it would be illegal under coronavirus laws.
Read more:
- ‘We do all worry it could have been us’: Hundreds descend on Clapham Common for Sarah Everard vigil as police treatment sparks anger
- Sarah Everard vigil: Cressida Dick says she will not resign amid growing anger over police actions
- Sarah Everard: Priti Patel demands full report into Metropolitan Police’s ‘upsetting’ response to Clapham vigil
- Priti Patel’s ‘brutal’ protests ban to blame for Sarah Everard vigil crackdown, says ex-Supreme Court judge
- Sarah Everard: Everything we know about 33-year-old and what happened to her
But hundreds of people through the day left flowers for Ms Everard at Clapham Common’s bandstand, near where she disappeared, and a large crowd had gathered in the early evening.
Sir Stephen told the committee that between midday and 6pm the vigil had complied with Covid regulations, but that people then started to make speeches from the bandstand and caused the crowd to draw together.
”We believe that when the crowd density increased, Covid regulations were no longer being followed,” he said, adding that officers were then faced with an “incredibly difficult situation” and had been met with abuse for trying to disperse the crowds.
Sir Stephen said that officers had tried to issue fines but when people refused to give their names and addresses, the police were left with a choice of dropping the fines or making arrests.
He added: “The officers decided to proceed and make arrests for failing to give the information, and also in one case a public order offence.”
While largely peaceful, the vigil was marred by scuffles, with police officers accused of heavy-handedness after some women were bundled to the ground and handcuffed.
Sir Stephen told the committee: “I understand that their actions have upset people and we see the evidence of that on a daily basis and we do not underestimate the upset that has been caused.
“But the officers took their actions believing they were doing the right thing to protect people’s health. They were following legislation put in place by parliament to protect the public in the middle of a health crisis. That health crisis has not yet gone away.”
The current lockdown laws in England neither explicitly ban nor explicitly allow protest, and human rights groups have called for police to facilitate demonstrations.
Reclaim These Streets organisers, who were threatened with £10,000 fines and potential prosecutions, asked the High Court to rule on the correct interpretation of the regulations last Friday.
A judge refused to make a formal declaration but said the Metropolitan Police could facilitate protest during England’s lockdown.
Sir Thomas Winsor, HM chief inspector of constabulary, is to carry out a review into the way the event on Clapham Common was policed after senior politicians including the home secretary, Priti Patel, and the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, raised concerns.
Sir Stephen said the force fully supported the independent review and that it was already passing on the information required.
He said: “We want to ensure that the facts of what happened are fully understood, that we are completely transparent in what happened, and that the public understand why we acted as we did.”
Sir Stephen also said there was a sense of “disbelief, anger and betrayal” in the force that an officer had been charged with the kidnap and murder of Ms Everard.
Serving Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens, 48, has been charged with Ms Everard’s kidnapping and murder and will go on trial later this year.
An unnamed police officer is under investigation by the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) for allegedly sharing an “inappropriate graphic” in relation to the case.