Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Royal baby watch: How the media coverage stacks up so far

 

Felicity Morse
Monday 22 July 2013 13:22 EDT
Comments
A mobile phone displays a Tweet from Clarence House outside St Mary's Hospital
A mobile phone displays a Tweet from Clarence House outside St Mary's Hospital (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Duchess of Cambridge has gone into labour and already the media feeding frenzy has begun, with a clamour of royal ‘experts’, baby speculation and an army of information about the illustrious infant sprayed across the world’s news outlets.

Mail Online has whirred into overdrive, with long articles and pictures splashed across its website and every angle of the royal birth covered, from gynaecologists to a live stream of the hospital doors.

They are far from the only site to feel dizzy. The Daily Express tweeted the news this morning in capitals and a quick glance at its website this morning shows the royal baby is holding all news coverage hostage, similar to The Daily Mirror’s website.

The Telegraph, like many papers (including The Independent and The Guardian), is live-blogging the coverage of Kate’s admittance to hospital. The top quarter of the broadsheet’s website is dedicated to royal speculation, including a piece from Telegraph property on what the royal baby’s nursery may look like.

The Guardian has embedded a button on its website so readers can hide the royal baby news coverage altogether.

Indeed, it’s not just the media that are excited about the royal birth. One man has been sleeping on a bench across the road from the Lindo Wing, reports the Telegraph. According to the newspaper’s consumer affairs editor Steve Hawkes, Superdrug has decided to celebrate the royal birth by cutting 10p off cotton wool.

The Sun has plumped for the headline HEIR IT COMES, screamed across the top of their site, with an accompanying live blog and pictures. They have embedded in their article a ‘royal baby monitor’, which is essentially a live feed of the hospital doors.

Buzzfeed UK summed the whole coverage of the royal baby with an internet friendly pie-chart, listing how the web will react, including snarky pie charts about what everyone is saying about the royal baby.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in