Richard Okorogheye: Met Police apologise over handling of missing teen’s case as staff keep jobs

The 19-year-old was first reported missing on 23 March 2021 and his body was recovered from a lake in Epping Forest nearly a fortnight later, on 5 April

Race Correspondent

Wednesday 06 July 2022 08:18 EDT

The 19-year-old was first reported missing on 23 March 2021 and his body was recovered from a lake nearly a fortnight later. (Family handout/PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

Support Now

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Metropolitan Police has apologised to the family of a Black teenager for failings identified by a watchdog investigation into the handling of initial reports that he was missing - but this has been rejected by his mother.

Richard Okorogheye, 19, was first reported missing on 23 March 2021 and his body was recovered from a lake in Epping Forest nearly a fortnight later, on 5 April.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found in its investigation of how the case was handled that Mr Okorogheye should have been classed as a missing person earlier and he was classed as low risk for too long.

It also concluded the Met provided an “unacceptable” level of service to Ms Evidence Joel, Mr Okorogheye’s mother, after she reported her son was missing and the force should apologise.

Met Police deputy assistant commissioner Bas Javid said: “Our thoughts remain with Richard’s family and I would like to apologise for the distress caused by the substandard level of service, as highlighted by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.”

The IOPC investigation found six Met employees, three officers and three members of police staff, should receive enhanced training. However, none of the employees were found to have a case to answer for misconduct.

“The IOPC investigation has confirmed what I always knew - in the darkest period of my life, I was dismissed by multiple Metropolitan Police staff at all levels of seniority and my son’s disappearance was not taken seriously, Ms Joel said in a statement her lawyers.

Evidence Joel and Richard Okorogheye (Evidence Joel)

“It is a matter of deep regret to me that despite both the IOPC and Metropolitan Police concluding that the performance of three police officers (including an inspector) and three call handlers fell short of the standard expected, nobdy will face misconduct proceedings. Therefore the apology is not accepted.”

Complaints from Ms Joel were factored into the investigation including details of how she was treated during phone calls, such as one occasion where an officer told her words to the effect of: “If you can’t find your son, how do you expect us to?”

The distraught mother believed racism underpinned some of the treatment she received and that police were too slow to classify Mr Okorogheye as missing. Though the IOPC acknowledged that the comment was “inappropriate”, it “could not” be determined that the remark was influenced by racial bias.

The watchdog also discovered that police officers failed to correctly record Mr Okorogheye’s medical condition after they were told he had sickle cell anaemia. This, along with other information, should have been passed on sooner to the relevant team, the IOPC found.

One call handler inaccurately recorded the teenager’s condition as anaemia rather than sickle cell anaemia on the initial police report, while two others failed to update an inspector that Mr Okorogheye’s condition was sickle cell anaemia, as they believed there was no significant difference between the two conditions in terms of risk.

In the wake of the teenager’s disappearance, Ms Joel and campaigners told The Independent that public services are dismissing sickle cell patients because the illness disproportionately affects Black people.

IOPC regional director Sal Naseem said: “We have shared our findings with Richard’s family and our thoughts are with them and all those affected by his tragic death.

“Allegations of discrimination which are not overt are often difficult to prove and finely balanced. The evidence shows Ms Joel did have good reason to believe her concerns were not being taken seriously. She made multiple phone calls to police and concerns she raised about his condition were initially either misrecorded or underestimated. This can only have heightened Ms Joel’s perception of prejudice, as sickle cell anaemia is particularly common in people with an African or Caribbean family background.

“While officers are not expected to have a specific level of medical knowledge, it does make it vital that concerns raised by family members or medical professionals are given proper consideration, which did not happen in Richard’s case.”