Richard Dawkins says England is becoming a 'nasty little backwater'
Prominent atheist who has been vocally anti-Brexit says he can sympathise with Scots wanting to leave the Union
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prominent atheist and scientist Richard Dawkins has said England is becoming a “nasty little backwater,” as the government prepares begin the process of leaving the European Union.
The day before the UK government planned to trigger Article 50 and formally begin Brexit, the Scottish Parliament voted in favour of a second independence referendum.
Mr Dawkins has spoken out against Brexit since last summer’s referendum and once branded voters, including himself, “ignoramuses”.
“I opposed Scottish independence,” Mr Dawkins said on Twitter. “But if I were Scottish today I’d want to leave the nasty little backwater that England is becoming.”
The precise consequences of Brexit are currently unknown but critics have expressed fears that social, economic and environmental protections could be adversely affected.
A spike in racism in the months after the referendum also prompted concern about the climate towards migrants in the UK.
Earlier in March, Mr Dawkins further elaborated on his position against Brexit.
He told BBC Newsnight: “Constitutional amendments are – or should be – hard to achieve… Unlike ordinary law-making, constitutional changes are for keeps. Voters are fickle, opinions change.
“We have no right to condemn future generations to abide, irrevocably, by the transient whims of the present.”
Referencing the large number of votes needed in both houses of the US Congress to enact constitutional change, Mr Dawkins continued: “If ever a decision needed at least a two-thirds majority, it was Brexit. It has huge ramifications, complex consequences.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments