Rail safety shake-up 'puts lives at risk'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Deaths and injuries on the railways are likely to increase if the Government presses ahead with plans for a shake-up of the network, the chairman of the Health And Safety Commission has warned.
The Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, is expected to remove the rail inspectorate from the Health And Safety Executive - the operational arm of the commission - and switch it to the Office of the Rail Regulator, the network's economic watchdog.
Bill Callaghan said this could prejudice the protection of passengers and employees. He said ministers were bowing to pressure from the industry, which seemed to be seeking lower safety standards in an attempt to keep costs down.
"People would be horrified if they thought the industry was going to get its own way on safety," Mr Callaghan said.
"I'm sure inspectors would continue to do their excellent job, but they would be in a weaker position because the industry would be determining its own safety regulation."
Responding to accusations that the HSE was guilty of being overcautious and "gold-plating" safety procedures, Mr Callaghan said: "If the allegation is that safety standards are too high, then presumably they are looking for a lower standard of safety."
Rocketing costs on the railways were not the responsibility of the executive but were the result of "management balls-ups'' such as the project to modernise the west coast main line, he said. There was no conflict between high standards of safety and profitability.
Those who argued that the Civil Aviation Authority managed to police both costs and safety effectively, ignored the fact that the airline industry was more "compliant", he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments