Public Record Office: Heath's inquiry found he was the source of leak
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Edward Heath launched an inquiry into the leak of sensitive information while he was Prime Minister, only to be informed that he himself was the source of the disclosure. He was reluctant to authorise the top-level Whitehall inquiry into a story in The Times that the Cabinet was due to discuss an initiative on Northern Ireland in February 1972 – saying he found it "a bore".
But he was forced into it by officials who assumed he would like the opportunity to "read the riot act" to ministers who were being too free with privileged information, according to notes released by the Public Record Office today. The inquiry ended with a discreet note addressed to the Prime Minister by his private secretary, Robert Armstrong, which recorded that "the minister concerned was the Prime Minister".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments