Protesters appeal against Parliament Square eviction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peace protesters called on senior judges today to let them stay in a makeshift tent village outside Parliament.
They were ordered to leave Parliament Square Gardens by a High Court judge last week after a nine-day hearing but allowed to remain until today's appeal.
This is being heard by a panel of three judges headed by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger.
Jan Luba QC, representing one of the peace camp factions, said London Mayor Boris Johnson had no right to evict the protesters because he does not own the land, it belongs to the Queen.
He said the mayor failed to prove any legal title to the land and High Court judge Mr Justice Griffith Williams was wrong to find that he could reclaim it.
"The claimant cannot at will exclude the world from entering or remaining on Parliament Square Gardens and cannot bring possession proceedings."
Mr Luba also argued that even if the mayor could bring the proceedings, a court could not order possession because it would be incompatible with laws relating to rights to free speech and assembly.
Ashley Underwood QC, representing the mayor, said Parliament Square Gardens is an open space which the public have a right to use subject to the control of the mayor and to the Trafalgar Square and Parliament Square by-laws.
Mr Justice Griffith Williams had ruled that the mayor had the power to exclude the demonstrators and had reached a reasoned decision.
He said there was a pressing social need not to permit an indefinite camped protest on the site for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others to access.
The High Court judge said there was also a need to protect health - the camp has no running water, toilets and is attracting homeless people because of the lack of control.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the judges said that they hoped to give their decision next week and extended the stay - which allows the protesters to remain on the site - pending that judgment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments