Prince's secretary loses race bias case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A former personal secretary to the Prince of Wales lost her claim for racial and sexual discrimination at an employment tribunal in Bristol.
Elizabeth Burgess, 39, had claimed constructive dismissal from her post at the Prince's Highgrove estate in Gloucestershire after being verbally abused and made to feel unwelcome. Her case was rejected after the tribunal panel ruled that she had failed to prove any of her allegations.
Mrs Burgess, who resigned in March, had alleged that staff wanted to replace her with a temporary assistant, Siobhan Bucknall. Omar Malik, for Mrs Burgess, had said his client felt her face did not fit at Highgrove
"What Mrs Burgess is saying is that they were looking for a white face for secretary and that white face belonged to Siobhan Bucknall," he said.
Adam Tolley, solicitor for the Prince of the Wales, said Mrs Burgess' allegations were "outrageous". He said Mrs Burgess had been an unreliable and argumentative witness, who launched into "speeches" about alleged discrimination that had "no basis at all.
"We got a great deal of paranoid conspiracy theories, but without a single hard fact to back it up," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments