Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plan to make eight lanes may cost £650m

Ian Herbert,North
Thursday 17 January 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Consultants who have spent two years studying jams on the M6 told Stephen Byers, the Secretary of State for Transport, to make a 47-mile section of the motorway eight lanes wide.

The consultants Arup, commissioned by John Prescott when he was Transport Secretary, recommended that the notorious six-lane section from north Birmingham's Hilton Park services at junction 11 to junction 20, where it meets the M56 in Cheshire, must be widened, with the possibility of toll charges in the long-term.

If the Government takes up the recommendation it will represent a capitulation to the near-inevitable.

M6 widening was first proposed 10 years ago but put on hold by Mr Prescott after protests over the Newbury and Winchester bypasses coincided with Labour's plans for an integrated transport policy.

Arap concluded that the unreliability of the M6, which carries up to 90,000 vehicles each hour, was affecting the "economic health" of the North.

If approved, the work would probably take six years and cost about £650m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in