Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ordinary people priced out of running for parliament, new study reveals

Standing for election costs the average candidate £11,000 of their own money, research finds

Sunday 02 September 2018 17:03 EDT
Comments
Parliament
Parliament (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ordinary people are being priced out of standing for Parliament by the huge personal cost of becoming a party candidate, a new study has suggested.

Fighting a seat sets a person back an average £11,118, researchers found, after taking into account reducing working hours to campaign, the cost of getting selected as a candidate in the first place, and travelling around a constituency.

But the sum was found to be even greater for those attempting to win marginal seats.

Conservative candidates who won in such constituencies were found to have spent an average £121,467, while those who lost still spent £18,701. For Labour, the average personal cost of taking a marginal was £19,022, with candidates who failed were set back even more: £35,843.

This personal spending is distinct from official party spend which is regulated by the Electoral Commission.

The figures are revealed in a new book, Why We Get The Wrong Politicians, by journalist and some time Independent contributor Isabel Hardman.

The book also details the personal impact of standing for election, including relationship breakdowns, abuse, and candidates’ children needing counselling in the aftermath of a bruising campaign.

Ms Hardman calls it “the most expensive and time-consuming job interview on earth – and one without any guarantee of getting the job at the end”.

She proposed that both major parties and non-partisan groups should offer bursaries to improve the social and economic make-up of parliament.

The Conservatives Party said it has already introduced a small bursary fund, while Labour has been discussing the idea.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in