Parents' anguish as High Court says doctors should not 'artificially prolong' boy's life
The two-year-old boy suffers from an incurable and unidentified neurological disorder and his condition is deteriorating
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The parents of a “profoundly neurologically disabled” two-year-old boy have said they are “devastated” by a High Court ruling allowing doctors only to provide him with palliative care.
A High Court judge ruled the boy's life should not be “artificially prolonged” after NHS hospital bosses, with responsibility for the boy’s care, said limiting treatment to palliative care would be lawful and in his best interests.
The boy suffered from an incurable and unidentified neurological disorder and specialists said his condition was deteriorating. Nurses said he had stopped smiling and no longer giggled when tickled.
“Further invasive intervention,” specialists said, would be traumatic and arduous for the boy and he would only have a negligible therapeutic benefit.
The child’s parents were against only providing palliative care and implementing an “end-of-life” plan, insisting all treatment options should be available.
They said Mrs Justice Parker's ruling "effectively condemns their son to death".
The judge oversaw the case at a public hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London and made a ruling on Wednesday.
She said ‘artificially prolonging” the boy’s life would not be in his best interests and bosses at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust had asked her to make a ruling.
Additional reporting by Press Association