Paddington crash manslaughter charges blocked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There will be no manslaughter prosecutions over the Paddington rail crash, it has been announced.
The Crown Prosecution Service said there was "insufficient evidence" to provide a realistic prospect of conviction of an individual or company.
Thirty-one people died when a Thames train collided with a morning rush-hour Great Western express outside Paddington station in west London on October 5, 1999.
The CPS also said there was insufficient evidence to bring an offence of endangering the safety of railway users under the 1861 Offences against the Person Act.
The CPS said it had carefully considered the evidence submitted by the British Transport Police following a "substantial investigation" into the circumstances of the collision.
The Health and Safety Executive has said that the initial cause of the accident appeared to be that the Thames train - driven by Michael Hodder, 31 - went through a red signal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments