Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Paddington approach signals 'dangerously obscured'

Pa
Monday 18 October 1999 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A new report from an independent expert warns that 24 signals on the approach to Paddington station are dangerously obscured.

A new report from an independent expert warns that 24 signals on the approach to Paddington station are dangerously obscured.

An investigation by Roy Bell, a former director of testing for British Rail and Railtrack, examined signals near the station in the area where two trains collided after one went through a red light on October 5.

According to BBC Radio Four's Today programme, his report found 24 signals were dangerously obscured by bridges, overhead cables and other obstructions.

All the signal lights were working, the programme reported.

However, Mr Bell said it would be safer for the obscured signals to be taken out of service.

The report, commissioned by the train drivers' union Aslef, threw into doubt Railtrack's reported plans to reopen lines outside the station tomorrow.

Rail regulator Tom Winsor told Today the report was 'an important matter', but the decision on when to recommence services would be made by the Health and Safety Executive, which had yet to decide.

Norman Baker, Liberal Democrat MP for Lewes, where another, more minor, train crash occurred last night, said of the report: 'We need a full and convincing rebuttal from Railtrack and an all-clear from the Health and Safety Executive before Paddington can reopen.

'We can't take any chances,' he told BBC Radio Four's Today programme.

Graham Stringer, a Labour member of the Commons Transport Select Committee, told Today: 'Railtrack should say openly and publicly how they intend to respond to this report and how they can ensure the public is safe.'

Jonathan Bray, of pressure group Save our Railways told Today: 'This is very disturbing. 'I think the Health and Safety Executive need to look at this report as a matter of urgency.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in