Oscar Pistorius trial raises questions about televised proceedings, warns Lord Chief Justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The dramatic scenes witnessed across the world at the Oscar Pistorius murder trial have raised concerns about filming legal proceedings, the Lord Chief Justice has warned.
Lord Thomas, head of the judiciary in England and Wales, told the Lords constitution committee he was "very troubled by what has happened in South Africa" and called for a "pause" before making any more decisions about televised trials.
The ongoing murder trial against the South African athlete has ignited a global media frenzy and viewers have watched an emotional Pistorius break down at the sight of graphic evidence, crying and vomiting in court.
His dramatic outbursts have been called into question by chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel, who suggested the athlete turned to crying to avoid tough questions about the night he shot and killed his girlfriend.
Last month, the athlete's legal team was forced to issue a statement denying Pistorius took acting classes ahead of his murder trial following accusations that he was faking his tears for the cameras.
Lord Thomas' comments come after Keir Starmer, former Director of Public Prosecutions, predicted that cameras could broadcast live from criminal courts in Britain "within the next five years".
He told the Daily Mail: "The principle is open justice and there's a disconnect between the fact we've got a right to walk into any court but it can't be screened. Most people don't have the time to go to court and therefore they don't know what's going on in courts.
"And it is odd that I suspect in most households the legal system in Italy because of the Amanda Knox case, in South Africa because of the Pistorius case and then the US because of OJ Simpson are better known than their own legal systems."
Mr Starmer suggested that making televised trials the norm would remove the sensationalist element seen in recent high profile cases such as the Max Clifford trial.
Arguments and remarks made by lawyers and judges can be filmed at the Court of Appeal, but victims and defendants are not shown. Hearings at the Supreme Court are also televised.
Cameras are not allowed in Crown Courts and Magistrates' courts.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments