Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Opponents of renationalising the railways have some impressive numbers to bolster their case

Expertise is not the sole preserve of the private sector

Simon Calder
Saturday 19 September 2015 15:48 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Opponents of renationalising the railways can wheel out some impressive numbers to bolster their case. In the two decades since privatisation began, the number of rail passengers nationwide has more than doubled. London Waterloo alone will handle 100 million passengers this year, making it the busiest transport hub in Europe, well ahead of Heathrow.

Correlation does not signify causation, however. Proponents of renationalisation can point to the taxpayers’ billions pumped into projects such as the West Coast mainline refurbishment and Great Western electrification. Much-needed public investment to boost capacity and cut journey times has rewarded firms such as Virgin Trains.

Yet yearning for the golden, preprivatisation days of British Rail is misplaced, because the passenger experience was dire.

Successive governments had regarded the railways as an expensive nuisance. When spending cuts were needed, the trains could be squeezed until the rivets squeaked. Despite heroic efforts from frontline staff and managers, train journeys were expensive and unreliable.

Parts of the privatisation process were botched, but the sector arrived with ambition to revive an industry wearily accustomed to managing decline.

For the first time in living memory, the terms “new trains” and “cross-country routes” were used in the same sentence with Sir Richard Branson’s plans for better links connecting Newcastle with Plymouth and Manchester with Southampton.

Chiltern Railways put hundreds of millions into restoring the double tracks between London and Birmingham – but Chiltern is owned by Deutsche Bahn, Germany’s nationalised railway operator, and that highlights the weakness in present arrangements: rail franchise bids are welcome from public-sector firms, so long as they are foreign.

Directly Operated Railways, a Department for Transport offshoot, took over the East Coast line when the franchisee walked away, and ran it brilliantly. But the team was not allowed to bid to retain the route. Expertise and imagination are not the sole preserve of the private sector.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in