Ofsted changed Baby P report, papers reveal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ofsted rewrote a report after the Baby Peter tragedy, making it more critical of former children's services chief Sharon Shoesmith, documents released by the High Court show.
Inspectors from the childcare regulator were also told to delete emails relating to their review of Haringey Council in north London, the documents reveal, although this was soon retracted. Ofsted's final report on the local authority, published in 2008, led to the sacking of Ms Shoesmith, 57. Thousands of documents were made public yesterday after a request by media organisations.
The final report contains implicit criticism of Ms Shoesmith that was not in the first version, the BBC reported. One of the main findings in the published document, not in the earliest draft, reads: "There is insufficient strategic leadership and management oversight of safeguarding children."
Ofsted said it was "normal practice" for reports to be drafted, edited and finalised. Ms Shoesmith claims she was unfairly dismissed and the documents were unfairly altered.
The court is expected to rule after Easter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments