Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

No plans to raise criminality age

Victoria Richards
Saturday 13 March 2010 20:00 EST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Calls for the age of criminal responsibility to be raised to 12 were rejected yesterday as the Government insisted the two 10-year-olds who killed James Bulger in 1993 were old enough to face trial.

The Children's Commissioner, Maggie Atkinson, had said Jon Venables and Robert Thompson were "too young" to comprehend the consequences of killing two-year-old James and that they should have been held in a contained environment with "intense programmes, appropriate to their age" to help them "make positive and lasting changes".

The Ministry of Justice yesterday said children aged 10 can differentiate between "bad behaviour and serious wrongdoing".

It added: "We do not intend to raise the age of criminal responsibility. It is not in the interests of justice, of victims or the young people themselves to prevent serious offending being challenged."

Felicity Gerry, a criminal barrister, said the law now requires Crown Prosecution Service lawyers to decide if child offenders understand what they did was wrong. "There is no need to change the age of criminal responsibility as long as prosecutors are applying the proper tests in deciding whether or not to prosecute."

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in