National Union of Mineworkers launches court bid to challenge Arthur Scargill
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The National Union of Mineworkers today asked the High Court to decide whether it is obliged to meet the cost of former leader Arthur Scargill staying in his London flat.
Mr Scargill, 74, who was the NUM's president for 20 years until July 2002, has occupied the Barbican apartment, rented from the Corporation of London, since June 1982.
The rent and associated expenses were paid by the union until 2011, except for a period between 1985 and 1991 when Mr Scargill met them out of his own pocket.
The NUM's counsel, Nicholas Davidson QC, said that the case was not about whether anyone thought that any particular obligation ought to exist - but whether it did exist.
If it did, Mr Scargill was entitled to have the benefit of it.
He told Mr Justice Underhill that the action concerned whether the union was obliged to meet the costs of the use of the flat for the rest of Mr Scargill's life and the lifetime of his widow, should he leave one.
Other issues were whether his fuel allowance for his house in Barnsley, Yorkshire, had a limit, other than simply the total amount of his consumption in the year, and whether the union was obliged to pay - for his lifetime - the cost of his security system there and the preparation of his annual tax return.
Mr Davidson said that the litigation, which will look at documents dating back 30 years, was concerned with identifying what terms were agreed between duly authorised representatives of the NUM and Mr Scargill.
Mr Scargill's counsel, Timothy Pitt-Payne QC, argues that he is entitled to the retirement benefits under the terms of his successive contracts of employment with the NUM and pursuant to various decisions of the union and its constituent bodies.
He is seeking declarations that the NUM is obliged to pay, plus payment of the Barbican expenses from June 2011 to date and payment of the fuel, security and accountancy costs incurred by Mr Scargill since they were suspended in April 2010.
The hearing, which is expected to hear evidence from a number of witnesses including Mr Scargill, is due to last a week.
The hearing was adjourned until tomorrow.
PA
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments