Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

National Association of Head Teachers vote to 'vigorously reject' Conservative grammar school expansion

The conference was also used to highlight school funding cuts and problems with recruitment 

Chloe Farand
Saturday 29 April 2017 18:01 EDT
Comments
The NAHT says there is not "compelling evidence" grammar schools promote social mobility
The NAHT says there is not "compelling evidence" grammar schools promote social mobility (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) has voted to “vigorously reject” the expansion of grammar schools in England.

Headteachers at the union’s conference voted at 97 per centre in favour of rejecting Conservative plans for a new wave of selection schools in the absence of "any compelling evidence that it promotes social mobility".

The NAHT argued early years education was a bigger driver of social mobility and should be the focus of the next Government. It called for more funding to ensure all children were given the same chances early on in their education.

Theresa May made the expansion of grammar schools the cornerstone of her social mobility programme but the move is opposed by Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

The union also used the conference to highlight the fact secondary schools in England were facing a “perfect storm” of pressures, including £3bn real term cuts to school budgets by 2020, changes to exams, difficulties in recruiting teachers and Brexit. It added these pressure could have severe consequences for children.

NAHT delegates backed a motion for executives to keep school funding as a priority and "explore every available option open to schools" if "irresponsible funding cuts" are not reversed.

This could include school leaders refusing to submit their budgets or running a deficit budget and headteachers introducing a four-and-a-half day week as “a last resort”.

Carlisle headteacher Graham Frost said no school leader wanted to cut their curriculum or staff numbers but that headteachers already "trimmed our sails".

Speaking ahead of the vote in Telford, NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby said there was a risk the secondary school system would break.

He said: "The combination of challenges facing secondary schools and their students has never been greater.

"Many school leaders are concerned about maintaining high standards in the face of simultaneous upheaval on so many fronts. It's a perfect storm.

"The Government is loading more uncertainty onto the secondary system than ever before. There is a real risk it will break."

Mr Hobby repeated warnings schools were facing "unacceptable levels of financial pressure” but that the government was not responding to headteachers’ concerns.

More than 500 head teachers signed a letter to Theresa May on Saturday accusing her of pushing Britain’s education system to breaking point.

In the letter sent by Mr Hobby and published in The Mirror, teachers said they were having to ask parents for donations in a desperate bid to pay staff and fund resources.

Mr Hobby told the conference school funding had to be among the questions raised within each constituency ahead of the 8 June general election, the BBC reports.

“All that's left is for us to make it a general election issue. We need to make sure that all our parliamentary constituencies are asking questions on school funding,” he said.

Last month, the powerful House of Commons Public Accounts Committee warned that the Department for Education had “buried its head in the sand” over the problems the funding cut will cause.

The Department for Education previously said schools funding is at record levels and is set to rise further.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in