Mystery of bankrupt firm with ruby worth £11m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A construction company that went into administration with the loss of more than 300 jobs declared an £11m ruby as one of its assets, it has emerged.
Wrekin Construction was due £2m from government contracts, but owed more than £3.5m in VAT and tax bills when it collapsed last week, according to administrator Ernst & Young.
It now appears that the company listed the purchase of the precious stone, the "Gem of Tanzania", in its 2007 accounts. A note in the accounts said that Wrekin bought the ruby from owner Tamar Group for a "fair value" of £11m, paid in interest-bearing preference shares.
The note declares: "The fair value of the ruby gemstone was determined by a professional valuer [in] Italy, on 31 August 2007."
Investigators are believed to be struggling to find anyone who has actually seen the gem. Peter Greenwood, Wrekin's joint managing director, said the ruby was locked away in a safe deposit box, although he added that he had never seen it himself.
The auctioneers Christie's said the highest recorded price paid for a ruby was £2.6m, in 2006, according to the Financial Times.
Ernst & Young said it was "too early to comment" on the unusual asset or on reports that the gem revived the company's flagging balance sheet when it was bought.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments