Minor speeding penalties to be cut
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, is preparing to lower the penalties on motorists for minor speeding offences to defuse a growing row over speed cameras.
Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, is preparing to lower the penalties on motorists for minor speeding offences to defuse a growing row over speed cameras.
Downing Street has become alarmed by motorists' hostility towards speed cameras. Speeding offences incur three penalty points and drivers who amass 12 points on their licences face an automatic ban.
Mr Darling will try to calm the public outcry by launching a consultation next month on proposals to reduce the number of points for each offence from three to two, if the driver has been marginally over the speed limit. The penalty for those caught travelling well in excess of the speed limit could be raised to six points.
In 2002, 30,000 drivers lost their licences through the totting up of points. The number of motorists caught speeding on camera in 2002 rose by 40 per cent to 1.5 million, Home Office figures show. That could double to an estimated 3 million this year.
Many drivers have to pay high insurance premiums and some can lose their livelihoods if they cannot drive. Many motorists who live in the countryside, and who need their cars to shop or work, regard the speed cameras as a plague.
Mr Darling said: "We must reduce speeding but the public must have confidence that the punishment fits the crime."
Some police forces have been criticised for using the cameras to raise money through fines. Mr Darling said: "The best camera is one that doesn't issue a single ticket as it means people are driving safely within the speed limit."
Tony Vickers, a spokesman for the Association of British Drivers, said: "It's good news that the Government has recognised that the sledgehammer weapons of mass prosecution by speed cameras is causing a great deal of injustice and resentment."
But, he said, the proposals were "too simplistic". The Government should rely on traffic police patrols, rather than cameras, to determine whether someone was driving dangerously or recklessly, he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments